E2E Bridge Review

Allows for implementation of integration logic.


What is most valuable?

UML and integration work hand in hand. It allows for fast implementation of complex integration logic.

How has it helped my organization?

Integration will never be a challenging topic to discuss.

What needs improvement?

The latest version of the product has improved tremendously. Maybe they need to support more connectivity protocols. I did not use the latest version, so I can't comment which connectivity protocols are unsupported right now. In the older version, not all connection types were supported.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used E2E Bridge for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable middleware and there is no need to have a high spec server.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not had scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

In the past, we only had support from Switzerland. Currently, we have partner support in Malaysia and in the Philippines.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have a previous solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

E2E is cheaper compared to IBM, Oracle, webMethods, and other middleware solutions.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I was not involved.

What other advice do I have?

This product is a full-suite integration product.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Scheer, IBM, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest