What is most valuable?
All the proxies have the same features, but the idea here is about URL categorization and the support you have. I found this very interesting in Forcepoint.
In terms of functionality, Forcepoint is the best web proxy available.
I'm an engineer, and as an engineer, I often try to use the best solutions and ones I'm most comfortable with. I like Forcepoint. It's very good for implementation, but it's functionality is great. It has very, very deep technical features, and in-depth introduction features. I really encourage anyone to have it in their environment.
What needs improvement?
If the solution had a lower cost, it would be easier to implement.
In the 8.5 version of the solution, I took some issue with the interface.
I'd recommend that the company supports more process to matrix files. We've had issues with that.
The solution should be better able to support itself and operate faster. Sometimes the technical support team takes too long to respond.
For how long have I used the solution?
I was first introduced to Forcepoint in 2013. At that point, it was Websense and has since been acquired. I've been using the solution in total for about two years. I've spent the same amount of time with the email and web security parts of Forcepoint as well.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. I didn't see any issue regarding stability. The hub itself is very powerful. It's very good that I can look at the hardware good or node maintenance and see where there are vulnerabilities.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I implemented it in an environment with multiple users and other environments which included about 20 other items and I've found scalability to be great. You can have a lot of appliances that act as a cluster and you could have high availability on a sort of virtual ID server. You can do additional ID configurations from the other appliances so that typically it extends well. You don't have to have something like download X5. If you have two appliances, you just need to distribute both. For example, you can do it from the configuration. I couldn't find any situation in my work with Forcepoint that was not able to satisfactorily scale. So you can really make it as you wish.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support sometimes takes too long to respond to queries.
How was the initial setup?
In terms of implementation, if you are going to implement Forcepoint, you have to think about how you will deploy it in your proxy environment. You have the ability code, as well as other items.
If you are implementing Forcepoint in web proxy, it has to be P1 or P2. It has to be on the user onsite as V2 on V5. You could, for some environments, have two interfaces that communicate with each other. You cannot get both to interface, however. If you use the P1 for a user's internet, you then have to make P1 access the internet.
What other advice do I have?
We're a Forcepoint business partner in Egypt.
There are a lot of features already in the application and a lot of features that are added every day, so you have to learn how to implement them. If you decide to use the solution, you have to plan it out and prepare for it. You also have to update your knowledge and make sure your system is updated with regard to the solution. The most difficult part about Forcepoint is that if you take some time away from not working with it you forget features and processes. You need to work on it often and continue learning about it all the time.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.