HCL Workload Automation Review

Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs


What is our primary use case?

We are using this solution to migrate to other projects.

What is most valuable?

With the mainframe environment that we have, it is more similar to the HCL migration, or the workload scheduler. 

We also like the CWHC utilities; they are more current and under the umbrella of HCL. It reduces project risks.

Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot. You can start working immediately.

Migration is increased while it decreases the cost of the project.

What needs improvement?

The interface needs some improvements. It needs to be more user-friendly simplified.

The preparation for the jobs needs some work to make it quicker in the correct way and on time.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with HCL Workload Automation for approximately four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have only contacted the technical support team two or three times. Once we complete the project, we hand it over to our operations team.

The technical support is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with a similar solution from another vendor.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. It's not complex.

I can take three to five days to complete the initial setup and installation.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, this is a good product.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Add a Comment
Guest