IBM MQ Review

We use queue managers/concentrators for message flow going upstream and downstream on applications with enterprise licenses


What is our primary use case?

We use queue managers/concentrators for message flow going upstream and downstream on applications with enterprise licenses.

How has it helped my organization?

Adding concentrators was great improvement, but it lacks the SonicMQ CAA (continuous availability architecture). 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are queue managers and CCDT, which is the common purpose of most client applications.

What needs improvement?

SonicMQ CAA (continuous availability architecture) functionality on auto failover and data persistence should be made available without a shared drive, as it exists in multi-instance queue managers.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Add a Comment
Guest
Sign Up with Email