It supports:
- Siebel
- SAP
- Terminal based applications
IBM Rational Functional Tester Review
Quiet stable but it has memory issues frequently
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Reports - Default results log has a lot of useless info, and this is hiding the actual information needed. I have to use customized reports, which we don't expect from paid tool.
For how long have I used the solution?
Eight months.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Installation is straight forward.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Quiet stable but it has memory issues frequently, which can be solved easily.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is able to handle volume.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Haven't contacted customer service so far.
Technical Support:Good, encountered a problem and a solution was provided by tech support within a couple of days.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were replacing an expensive solution - Worksoft Certify.
How was the initial setup?
Installation is straight forward.
What about the implementation team?
In-house team.
What was our ROI?
It's cheaper than our existing solution, Worksoft Certify
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Organization bought the whole Rational Suite at a very low price.
What other advice do I have?
It does not fully justify being a paid tool, and it needs improvement. But as it is built on Ellipse/Java and costs is less than other tools, it is recommended.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Feb 15 2015
Author
it_user175548
Technical Lead - QA at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
BUYER'S GUIDE
Download our free Functional Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ, and more!
