Jenkins Review

It's simple and intuitive but the plugins need to be streamlined

• Extensibility
• Usability

We've achieved continuous integration and delivery on all our commits, securing the quality of all of our products on their main branches. The features used come almost out of the box.

Many of the plugins needs to be streamlined, their terminology needs to be the same and some plugins should be split into multiple smaller plugins.

Since 2010, so almost five years.

No issues encountered.

Minor, but those issues typically gets fixed after reporting them. Some issues can be addressed as pull requests, fixing them myself.

No, not after the lazy-load of items were introduced.

5/10.

5/10.

I used Hudson before, so the switch was quite natural.

In-house implementation.

My colleagues and I did the setup, so only the hours we spent doing it.

We also looked at Buildbot.

Just go for it. It's simple and intuitive.