Juniper SRX Review

We are satisfied with its stability , but we don’t advise others to implement a cluster design other than Active/Passive.


What is most valuable?

Stateful inspection , IPSEC and NAT as per our customers' design. The boxes are used as SecGW, Gi and SGi Firewall, those are the features usually needed in 3G/4G context.

How has it helped my organization?

It improved in term of security.

What needs improvement?

Clustering fab interface doesn't support bandwidth aggregation. This limitation caused a huge design change in our network.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for eight years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Yes, some bugs in module restart and cluster failover, but without outage.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Yes, fab interface doesn't support bandwidth aggregation

How are customer service and technical support?

9 out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No, we didn't.

How was the initial setup?

Not complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We didn’t use any other solutions so I can’t compare this to others.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

What other advice do I have?

We are satisfied with its stability , but we don’t advise others to implement a cluster design other than Active/Passive.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Juniper SRX reviews from users
...who work at a Comms Service Provider
...who compared it with Cisco ASA Firewall
Add a Comment
Guest