Kaspersky Endpoint Security Review

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, and Trojans


What is most valuable?

  • Antivirus engine
  • Center Management
  • Security Center

How has it helped my organization?

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, Trojans, etc.

What needs improvement?

Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security.

For how long have I used the solution?

Nine years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

An eight out of 10 for technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes, we used a different solution. We changed it because it went down in support and providing up-to-date information.

How was the initial setup?

It is a mixture of both. You must know some information about installing a client server application in a WAN environment. You can use the guide as well to deploy the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.

What other advice do I have?

Must have an up-to-date system and should have minimum a mid-size range server.

**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with McAfee Endpoint Security
Add a Comment
Guest