Kaspersky Endpoint Security Review

It is an efficient and stable product


What is our primary use case?

Kaspersky performs well. While heavy on the client, it is very efficient. 

How has it helped my organization?

It works better than the previous solution. 

What is most valuable?

It is very efficient. I like its simplicity.

What needs improvement?

  • We would like to know where attacks are coming from.
  • It is hard to maintain the software and upgrade.
  • Sometimes, there are issues with filtering. E.g., I want to take out the message for an exclusion. Sometimes, this exclusion might become hard, because I use a lot of internal software, or the software is post positive. 

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have never used technical support.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

We were previously using Symantec. I switched to Kaspersky because it was simpler and more efficient.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I received a very good deal with Kaspersky.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

While I would recommend Kaspersky, I am now looking for a more complete solution as my business grows. I am looking for something that gives me the protection I need and an entire view of our network. I am currently looking at Trend Micro and Carbon Black.

What other advice do I have?

Most important criteria when selecting endpoint security vendors

  • Dependable
  • Good reviews.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest

Sign Up with Email