What is our primary use case?
I've used it a little bit for virtualization. I've been messing with it for the past month and a half, in an actual environment that goes to the outside world, anyway.
I have a cloud server running. I also have a web server. I'm using it mostly for hosting websites and basically having a cloud service, such as OneDrive or Google Drive.
How has it helped my organization?
The product overall has been useful, however, the solution is still too new to really give a concrete example as to how it's changed how the organization functions.
What is most valuable?
The solution is really easy to use. Basically, it takes just a few command-line statements to install and have it set up and running. From there, you can use the virtual manager, which is command-line. However, there's also a graphical user interface for it. It's just really easy to use. all-around
If you prefer command-line, there are all kinds of command-line options. You can pretty much run and manage all of the virtual machines straight from the command line, or you can use the practical user interface and do the same thing.
I noticed that there are even other services like Multitask. You can use Multitask on KVM.
What needs improvement?
From my skill set and what I'm capable of, I wouldn't know how to say what could be improved as it works exceptionally well. I know that things can always be improved.
One thing that maybe could be improved is making it easier to scale. It needs to be more clear on how to scale the storage space for virtual machines. That's one thing that's a little bit confusing. That's more systems administration, in general. If they would make it a little easier to do, then you wouldn't have to have so much systems admin knowledge in order to use one feature.
I tried to follow the information provided, however, then the partitions were added, the logical drive, and it didn't actually end up being initialized correctly. I'm pretty sure it's due to my own error, and not using it correctly. However, if they would have been clear on how to do it, or if they could even build a command that literally executes the necessary commands for you, just by typing, or using the virtual manager, that would have been helpful.
I've only used the solution for a short period of time, so maybe it's there, however, I'd like it if maybe they could combine some network manager type item in there to be able to bridge connections a little easier. Then, you wouldn't have to do it as a separate task. Perhaps their existing network management already includes that. I'm not sure.
For how long have I used the solution?
I haven't used the solution for very long at all. I started using it about a month and a half or so ago, since I've had this server. It's all very new to me right now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution seems to be quite stable. I haven't had any crashing, or any bugs or glitches so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I'm not sure if the solution can scale well or how easy it can scale as right now I'm having trouble figuring out how to do it correctly. It seems like it is a bit of a confusing process.
Basically, I'm a freelance contractor. Therefore, it's just me using the solution at this time.
How are customer service and technical support?
I haven't used technical support yet. I haven't been on the solution for very long.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I didn't previously use a different solution. I just recently got this server.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not too complex. There are just a few commands from the command line, and then you're good to go. It's very easy and very quick.
What other advice do I have?
I'm just a customer and an end-user. I don't have a business relationship with KVM at this time.
I'm using what should be the latest version of the solution right now.
I would advise other organizations that this solution is definitely a good choice. It's definitely something that's easy to use, however, you can have it on a fully functioning operating system that you're familiar with. Or, if you have a little less experience, it's something that you can get up and going really quickly. That said, it is still a type 2. That is a great thing. It functions, and it's under two pounds. It's basically like being on bare metal, which is really nice.
Overall, I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?