Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Review

I like the defects tabs, test planning and execution features.

Valuable Features:

  • Test Plan
  • Test Execution
  • Defects tab
  • Mapping tests to requirements
  • Reporting

Improvements to My Organization:

The reports we can generate are better.

Room for Improvement:

The performance needs work, as over the past couple years, where I have worked with large companies, I noticed slower response times.

Use of Solution:

I have used HP ALM and Quality Center and TestDirector for 18 years.

Deployment Issues:

There were some issues.

Stability Issues:

It is stable in its functionality, but there is some slowness with its performance.

Scalability Issues:

It seems to function with very large companies, but sometimes there seems to be a slower response time, and it could be an internal network issue within the company, but I'm not sure.

Customer Service:

I have not had to work with the customer service.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Jira
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment