What is most valuable?
LeanFT is a new solution, but in general, it's opened us up to a wider audience such as the developers, so they can actually do their unit testing. We couldn’t do that with HPE UFT. This is the big advantage of this tool.
The second thing is you can use more technologies than with UFT, including using different languages like Java.
The third part is that we can use the Cucumber test framework, which is something that you can use easily with LeanFT.
Quality Center is our testing management tool. When you're running a global team with more than 120 QA staff around the world, you need one repository to write, run, monitor, and share your test cases between teams.
This is the most valuable feature of this solution and you can do it very easily. The UI is very user-friendly. With one click, you can see the status of each project that you're executing. Quality Center is the Rolls Royce of solutions and I would give it the highest rating.
What needs improvement?
LeanFT should include more technologies. For example, I would like it to include the Scala programming language. That is one of the main language that we use.
There is a new product, HPE ALM Octane, which might be the solution for the gaps. I would like to see more connection to more products and processes, and including the DevOps into Quality Center.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability for both is okay.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is becoming more complex. Scaling involves more experienced people because it’s not easy to scale.
Because this is a new product, we're not at a stage to scale something. I don't know how it's going to scale. Based on what I’ve seen so far, it should be okay.
Since Quality Center is a web application, it's easy to add more users and products.
How is customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. We are located in Israel, with an Israeli team, so it's easy to contact them. We have the right phone numbers and from that standpoint, it's great.
How was the initial setup?
There's always room for improvement and additional customization that would be nice. In general, both solutions are quite easy to install.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
There is a debate between this solution and Selenium, and we use both of them. Your choice of tool depends on the technology and the gaps in each of them. We are not an “all-HPE shop”.
We looked at IBM’s RTC for an ALM solution. We use it now for implementing SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework), which is designed for feature tasks, user stories, and program board elements.
What other advice do I have?
We chose HPE because I had good experience with them when I was Test Director. In term of overall experience, HPE provides a good experience for the users and a lot of benefits which you cannot find with other vendors.