Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Review

We deal with our test cases and execution, and the mapping is taken care by the product

What is most valuable?

Features that support documentation and test results from Requirements through Test Cases to Scripts to Execution results (pass or fail), then to Defects.

How has it helped my organization?

Life was made easy by shifting the MS Office documentation to the product. We deal with our test cases and execution, and the mapping is taken care by the product. You pass/fail a test case and product tells you what requirements/features of the product are good to go into production.

What needs improvement?

Auto-generation of automation scripts. Integration into the UTF (earlier QTP) has little more scope to improve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used this solution for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?


What do I think about the scalability of the solution?


How are customer service and technical support?

A nine out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?


How was the initial setup?


What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Very expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Some Open Source tools, but did not choose them as they lack support.

What other advice do I have?

Have a skilled person to do the administration. You will love the ease of reporting that results in.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Jira
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user