Micro Focus ALM Quality Center Review

Helps In Managing Defects But Technical Support Is Weak.


What is most valuable?

The Defect Module helps the project team to track the defects in a structured and manageable way until defects closure.

How has it helped my organization?

Helps in terms of managing defects easily.

What needs improvement?

The technical support from the vendor is weak, as I believe the back end script support for the tool is not easy to access and modify by the customer.

For how long have I used the solution?

12 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far fine.

How are customer service and technical support?

Not good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.

How was the initial setup?

It depends on which version. The upgrade from version 9 to version 11 was not a straightforward upgrade because the whole platform changed. So the upgrade was a manual project and it took the organization a few months to upgrade all thousand projects.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Depends on company direction.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

What other advice do I have?

Compare with other test management tools to see their benefits. We did compare with JIRA. Every tool has its own pros and cons. It depends on the organization's needs.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Micro Focus ALM Quality Center reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Jira
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest