Micro Focus Data Protector Review

Strong Integration With HP Storage But Not As Comprehensive As Other Solutions


What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is integration with the HP storage unit. There is an HP product line called HP High-End Storage. We are primarily using Micro Focus Data Protector for SAP RT application, which is an earlier version. 

What is most valuable?

Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. 

It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration. 

What needs improvement?

In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now.

There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Micro Focus Data Protector for six to seven years. 

We have been using HP solutions, comprising HP servers, storage, and even the HP operating system unit, for five to seven years. Micro Focus Data Protector was configured and installed during the last tech research around six to seven years ago, and it is still in production. Currently, we have replaced the solution with some other solution, but for the older tech research, Micro Focus Data Protector is still working.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We're relying on this backup for our very critical core application. It's really good all the time for backup and restore operations. We never faced any issue. You can say it is a very smooth and stable experience.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability of Micro Focus Data Protector is good. There may be tens of thousands of users currently in our company.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is really good. They're always very cooperative and really very good. The support experience is actually very good.

How was the initial setup?

I was not there at that time. It shouldn't actually take much time, maybe a few weeks or one month.

What about the implementation team?

It was deployed by HP. Their deployment team installed and configured everything.

What other advice do I have?

It is a very good product if you want to go for the ZDB backup or the array integration with HP products. In general, when comparing Micro Focus Data Protector with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, NetBackup, or any other vendor, they are much more comprehensive and have much more capabilities.

I would rate Micro Focus Data Protector a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Micro Focus Data Protector reviews from users
...who work at a Manufacturing Company
...who compared it with Commvault
Add a Comment
Guest