What is most valuable?
- The fact that you don't have to worry about the infrastructure setup.
- The fact that 1000's of virtual users can log on to the cloud without having to set up.
- Provides a solution for new or existing customers.
- Alternative to LoadRunner, for new or existing clients with agile.
What needs improvement?
At the moment, its a bit early for us to tell - does everything we need it to. HP is looking to expand to see what exactly it can be used for.
For how long have I used the solution?
We did a trial since it was launched.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues with deployment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We were only running a small set of numbers, but no issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
It's not something we've really had to worry about - we were able to crack it open and begin. Technical Support
The help files on the web are good and the video links/ guides are good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use LoadRunner extensively for Performance testing.
How was the initial setup?
Setup was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
What was our ROI?
I can't calculate the ROI right now but I would assume a lot considering savings on infrastructure cost and license costs. It will still take some time to run a performance test but setup saves a lot of time.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluate a lot of testing tools. NeoLoad, LoadRunner, we prefer HP.
What other advice do I have?
If you're looking at an application that can be seen on the WAN and using agile approach, then its a tool that should be recommended and used.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Broadcom and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.