The most valuable features to us are--
- Ease of uploading the scripts, and
- Script maintenance.
The most valuable features to us are--
Sometimes the Book Time Slot option hangs if I cancel any test or time slot. Also, if the results file gets corrupted, then we need to contact HP to get the raw results.
We encountered no issues when deploying.
We've had no issues with stability.
We've scaled without issue.
Customer service is excellent.
Technical Support:Technical support is excellent.
I have used Borland SilkTest, JMeter and LoadUI. JMeter and LoadUI have limitations in terms of the protocols. SilkTest is not as user friendly as Performance Center.
It was not complex, but I needed to consult HP support a couple of times for clarification and for help in registering the load injectors.
We did it in-house.
If the organization is going to test multiple protocols like Ajax, TruClient, Citrix, and SAP frequently, then there is definitely a high ROI in using this tool. If it's only the HTTP protocol being used, then other less expensive tools will be sufficient.
It is quite expensive.