Microsoft Azure Container Service Review

Easy to use, low bandwidth requirements, and the data compression is good


What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution is for critical applications. I have it on two servers and for storage outside of my company.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data.

It's a solution that uses very little bandwidth.

It is very easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The customization is an area that needs improvement.

In the next release, I would like to see integration with the Microsoft Business ERP solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is stable, I have not had any issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is scalable, it's good.

We have fifteen users and two of them are engineers.

How are customer service and technical support?

To date, I have not contacted technical support and I correct the issues myself.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously I tried Carbonite. I switched because Microsoft Azure is more competitive and more stable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple.

It took approximately two months to deploy this solution.

I am the administrator and the only person who maintains this solution. You only need one person.

What about the implementation team?

I implemented this solution. I did not use any vendors or integrators.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The only other solution that I had used and evaluated was called Carbonite.

What other advice do I have?

This is a very good solution and I would recommend it to others.

I would rate this solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Microsoft Azure
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest