Neotys NeoLoad Review

When it comes to mobile HTTP load testing, this helps to script quicker.​ ​I would like to see reporting improved.

Valuable Features

Script designing and "free" network emulation are the most valuable features for us.

Improvements to My Organization

I have seen good productivity improvements of over 30% in script design.

Room for Improvement

Reporting needs to be better. I would like to see information such as Send Time, Receive Time, SSL, Waiting Time, and Blocking Time in my response times.

Use of Solution

I've been using it for two years.

Deployment Issues

We've had no issues with the deployment.

Stability Issues

There have been no stability issues.

Scalability Issues

We've had no issues scaling it for our needs.

Customer Service and Technical Support

When I've presented technical support with an issue, they're prompt in responding to me.

Previous Solutions

I had been using HP LoadRunner, Apache JMeter, SOASTA CloudTest, BlazeMeter and Rational Performance Tester. I chose this because when it comes to mobile HTTP load testing, Neoload helps script quicker.

Initial Setup

The initial setup was straightforward.

Implementation Team

We implemented it with our in-house team.

Pricing, Setup Cost and Licensing

Compared to other tools in the market, this is priced moderately. However, I see a lot of short term performance activities, and the license costs are higher in comparison. Most of the time, I just use JMeter in such cases.

Other Advice

Go ahead and give it a try.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Sign Up with Email