Neotys NeoLoad Review

Less manual scripting and ease of setting up monitoring are valuable features.


What is most valuable?

Less manual scripting and ease of setting up monitoring are very valuable features of the tool.

Loadrunner has extensive list of analysis features available whereas NeoLoad had limited when I worked.

How has it helped my organization?

It helped us deliver the solution for various customers within budget and efficiently.

What needs improvement?

Analysis can be further improved. I have been using LoadRunner analysis and it has been a very powerful tool.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it for six months.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

I have not encountered any deployment issues.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not encountered any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support's turnaround time for issue response is too good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked on various different performance testing tools, and I found NeoLoad very much within budget without compromising the quality of the product.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

A vendor team implemented it.

What other advice do I have?

More protocols can be added, and I would love to see if any profiler is included in it.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

4.0
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Neotys NeoLoad reviews from users
...who work at a Government
...who compared it with Apache JMeter
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Apache and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest