NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) Review

Stable and scalable with good interface, configuration, and flexibility


What is most valuable?

It has a good interface. Its configuration and flexibility are also good.

What needs improvement?

Its integration could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for a few years. I am using NetApp FAS AFF A300.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

I am satisfied with their technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have been using NetApp solutions for the last 15 years. I have also used EMC, which is also good, but flexibility-wise, NetApp is better.

How was the initial setup?

Its initial setup is easy. The deployment took a few days.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate NetApp FAS Series a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) reviews from users
...who work at a Healthcare Company
...who compared it with Dell EMC SC Series
Learn what your peers think about NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest