What is our primary use case?
The main use case of ONTAP is for users to utilize SharePoint. From there, they need to access data where there are specific applications as well as an individual shared folder.
It is being used for application purposes as well as for individual user purposes.
We are using the latest version.
How has it helped my organization?
This isn't an isolated solution. We must have NetApp to support our faster access on a file protocol. We found the same solution on Azure is just as helpful when compared to the on-premise solution.
The solution provides us unified storage, no matter what kind of data we have. If we take a normal storage account in the public cloud, then it may not be active in terms of identity level. However, using NetApp, we can leverage the identity management control integrating with our AD. From there, we can gain the computer user's access and maintain the user side entity for who is accessing what.
What is most valuable?
On-premises, we are using the same NetApp. We find the solution in Azure to be more reliable and tailorable in NetApp with the same NetApp features because it gives us the most updated NetApp solution.
If you have a larger amount of data than normal in the cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
From my months' experience, I haven't seen a single point of failure within the ONTAP, except for Azure maintenance.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is a very good feature. If our data reaches 90 percent (or some threshold level), it automatically increases the storage within ONTAP without our intervention.
The solution helps us control storage costs. It is scalable. If we need more storage, then we can opt for a monthly or yearly option.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good.
Once you register with NetApp Cloud Central, people will get in touch with you who can assist you with deploying your solution.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is the first time that we are using this type of a solution in the cloud.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward, but I would like NetApp to come up with an easier setup for the solution.
Deployment time depends on the client. On average, deploying the entire solution can take about a day (eight hours), if there are no issues.
For a standard storage implementation project, we need to have some shared storage for the client's application as well as the user groups and shared files that they have been using. To leverage this, we've been using this solution.
You need to go through the NetApp website and go through the documents regarding deploying ONTAP. If you experience any difficulties, there is a technical team to help you.
What about the implementation team?
Some of the sales managers and other team members helped me setup the environment. They explained to me how the pay as you go and BYOL models work. If you need to the BYOL model to work, they will use some temporary licenses for a 30-day evaluation. They are there for you from beginning to end if you need assistance.
What was our ROI?
Because we went with the BYOL instead of pay as you go, we haven't seen ROI.
Using this solution, the more data that we store, the more money we can save. If you use traditional cloud providers, then you cannot manage unified lists. For that, you would need to follow a set of rules and some other stuff. You also need to have more people managing the entire environment. Whereas, NetApp provides a single point solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy.
Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have. We would like NetApp to come up with a solution for this. For example, a customer may think, "Let's use this solution." Later, he realizes that, "This is our solution and I have this budget for the year. If we can pay upfront for one year, then we can reduced the amount we pay." This is currently not possible if we select the pay as you go model.
Your OCCM should always be the same as your ONTAP, e.g., suppose you have deployed one ONTAP, then due to some reason, you deleted it and also OCCM. Then, the next time that you want to deploy another OCCM and ONTAP, that same license won't work because the license is based on the OCCM serial ID.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other solutions. We only evaluated ONTAP.
NetApp is an industry leader as well as we have experienced with NetApp on-premise. That is the reason we chose NetApp as a reliable partner.
What other advice do I have?
We don't use the solution’s cloud resource performance monitoring.
I would rate this solution as a nine (out of 10).
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage
Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.