Netskope CASB Review

Good support and better than other solutions


What is most valuable?

They are very good at CASB as compared to other players.

What needs improvement?

They can focus more on ease of admin, ease of use, and ease of migration. Migration should be simple for companies that are using a different platform and would like to move to Netskope. Everyone looks for a simple migration.

They can also focus more on cloud services and cloud trends. They have to see the cloud market, and they should try to compete with Zscaler and other players. They should also work on licensing costs.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for a year.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their support is good, but there is room for improvement.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We are also using Zscaler.

How was the initial setup?

It was not complex, but it was also not easy. The deployment took close to two months for us.

What about the implementation team?

We used a reseller.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They should work on licensing costs.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others. It is a good product.

I would rate Netskope CASB a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Netskope CASB reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Zscaler SASE
Find out what your peers are saying about Netskope, McAfee, Microsoft and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: June 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest