Nintex Workflow Review

Often straightforward to set up, but integration, stability, and monitoring need to be improved

What is our primary use case?

We are using Nintex Workflow for internal reviews between banking groups, and automating the workflow.

What needs improvement?

Integrating with work services is required, and it's an area that needs improvement.

Stability needs improvement.

From a monitoring point of view, and alerting should be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nintex Workflow for almost four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have over 200 users in our organization.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have technical support available to us, but we have not utilized often, our resources are capable of addressing all of our technical issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we did not use another solution, it was our first test workflow system.

How was the initial setup?

With the initial setup, most of the cases are straightforward.

The deployment and implementation are done ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Comparatively, it's expensive.

What other advice do I have?

We are planning to decommission this product for use and we are still exploring other products.

I would recommend some other tools rather than this.

I would rate Nintex Workflow a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Nintex Workflow reviews from users
...who compared it with K2
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex, K2, Camunda and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user