NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Review

There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.

What is most valuable?

The ability to exploit injection capabilities.

How has it helped my organization?

It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC.

What needs improvement?

The vulnerability mapping needs some work.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the available RAM.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's proved to be a fairly stable product.

How are customer service and technical support?

It's fair, although more in-depth usage case studies and documentation are offered for a purchased licence.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did have previous solution, but changed because of a new company policy.

What about the implementation team?

It was implemented in-house.

What other advice do I have?

Perform lots of scans using a testing environment that is fairly closed to the production environment for meaningful results.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7, Acunetix, Qualys and others in Application Security. Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user