The ability to exploit injection capabilities.
NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Review
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC.
What needs improvement?
The vulnerability mapping needs some work.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the available RAM.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's proved to be a fairly stable product.
How are customer service and technical support?
It's fair, although more in-depth usage case studies and documentation are offered for a purchased licence.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did have previous solution, but changed because of a new company policy.
What about the implementation team?
It was implemented in-house.
What other advice do I have?
Perform lots of scans using a testing environment that is fairly closed to the production environment for meaningful results.
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: May 28 2015
Author
it_user245400
Application Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
BUYER'S GUIDE
Download our free Application Security Report and find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7, Acunetix, Qualys, and more!
