OpenShift Review

Simple and efficient, providing support throughout the whole platform


What is our primary use case?

We're using this solution for newly developed applications in house development applications. I'm an infrastructure architect and we are customers of Open Shift. 

What is most valuable?

I think the most valuable feature this solution provides is the possibility to have support throughout the whole platform, including logging, monitoring, op features, and the like. It's a simple solution. 

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see support for more than one server, a mobile user registry. With that, you could divide it more granulary for development and render for testing and using different IDs.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for six months. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution. I think we're going to stick with it. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable solution, we have around 40 users. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used IBM WebSphere.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward, it took around three to four days. We used the support and four or five of our engineering personnel for deployment. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing costs are quite cheap compared to other similar solutions. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More OpenShift reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon, VMware and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest