Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Review

Security is a lot easier than its competitors and it has well-integrated software


What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case was to configure our PSAs for our customized configuration. 

What is most valuable?

I like that it has high security. 

What needs improvement?

The whole performance takes a long time. It takes a long time to configure. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Palo Alto for six years. 

How are customer service and technical support?

I contact Palo Alto by email or by phone. Their support is good. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have previously worked with Cisco ASA. Palo Alto is a lot easier especially in regards to security. It is a well-integrated software.

How was the initial setup?

The difficulty of the deployment depends on our clients' environment and their requests.

We require a two-member team for support. 

In terms of how long it takes to deploy, again, it depends on the customers' environment. If the request is easy, it can take around two weeks.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Palo Alto a nine out of ten. 

In the next release, they should simplify the deployment process. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
More Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Cisco ASA Firewall
Add a Comment
Guest