Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Review

Protects us from cyber attacks and malware

What is our primary use case?

We use the firewall in the network.

How has it helped my organization?

It protects us from cyber attacks.

What is most valuable?

One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection.

What needs improvement?

Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I think the stability is better than Fortinet or Check Point

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is there, for an enterprise network or a big company. It's good. It can support many endpoints and servers. We have over 2,000 users, most of them are end-users.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good. There are no problems with it.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before, we used Fortinet and Check Point.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is neither complex nor easy. We worked with the vendor and they have more experience than us. For the PoC they did the configuration for us and we were able to learn from them.

Our deployment took about two months.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's not too expensive. It's a more powerful tool for IT companies that need a next-generation tool.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention reviews from users
...who work at a Comms Service Provider
...who compared it with Cisco NGIPS
Add a Comment