pfSense Review

We've found multiple features, such as multi-WAN capability and dynamic DNS, valuable, but the load balancing of multiple networks could be improved.


What is most valuable?

  • Firewall
  • State Table
  • Network Address Translation (NAT)
  • High Availability
  • Multi-WAN
  • Server Load Balancing
  • Virtual Private Network (VPN)
  • PPPoE Server
  • Reporting and Monitoring Applications
  • Dynamic DNS
  • Captive Portal
  • DHCP Server and Relay

How has it helped my organization?

The reporting and monitoring applications improve our organization.

What needs improvement?

Load balancing of multiple networks

For how long have I used the solution?

3 Year

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Compatibility Issues

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

None

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

None

Technical Support:

Excellent

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes

How was the initial setup?

Simplest

What about the implementation team?

Extraordinary

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

pfSense software has the flexibility to integrate into wide area on a worldwide range of hardware. Among all monitoring and firewalls application. I haven't see powerful tools like PfSense.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

2.7
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More pfSense reviews from users
...who work at a Comms Service Provider
...who compared it with Sophos XG
Learn what your peers think about pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest