What is our primary use case?
Prisma SaaS can be used to secure sanction applications that people use on enterprises. You can integrate the solution using ATI to sanction applications such as Office 365, Google, and Salesforce. You can apply controls to protect from data leakage and then apply cloud-based DLP policies.
What is most valuable?
The valuable features are that it is easy to use, easy to integrate, and is stable. It's scalable as well.
What needs improvement?
When it comes to integration mechanisms, Prisma SaaS does not support reverse proxy type of integrations. For example, a product like Netskope has a lot more integration mechanisms than does Prisma.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using it for about one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable. We have about 500 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support has been good.
How was the initial setup?
Prisma SaaS requires a small implementation. Two engineers would be sufficient for the deployment process.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it ourselves.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Prisma SaaS at seven on a scale from one to ten. It is easy to integrate and is stable and scalable, but it needs to support reverse proxy integrations.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?