The primary use case is SAP. It work very well.
SAP is very important to our business. We are running all ERP solutions. Our configurations are run on-premise.
Pure Storage FlashArray Review
It simplifies the administration and backup
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It has easy implementation.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is its simplicity. It simplifies the administration and backup.
The predictive performance analytics works well.
What needs improvement?
I would like to have support available in Spanish.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is perfect. The reliability is 100% and the latency is always lower than 1 millisecond.
The speed is very high on SAP from running it on Pure Storage, and the power on SAP HANA is much faster.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is good.
How are customer service and technical support?
I would rate the technical support as a ten out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We deployed directly with Pure Storage.
What was our ROI?
The ROI is very positive for the reductions in HANA.
We have seen a 5:1 reduction in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).
We are finding the TCO of flash to be lower than SSD implementations by 2:1.
What other advice do I have?
It's a simple, robust solution, which is very stable.
Pure Storage is very good and quick for backing up SAP HANA.
**Disclosure: IT Central Station contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: May 26 2019
More Pure Storage FlashArray reviews from users...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...at Large Enterprises
...who compared it with HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashArray. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2021.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Author
Felipe Labarca
CTO at Ticel
Real User
Highlights
Pros
The stability is perfect. The reliability is 100% and the latency is always lower than 1 millisecond.
Cons
I would like to have support available in Spanish.
Product Categories
All-Flash Storage ArraysPopular Comparisons
NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS)
Dell EMC Unity XT
IBM FlashSystem
HPE Nimble Storage
Dell EMC PowerStore
VMware vSAN
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Nutanix Acropolis AOS
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series
Dell EMC XtremIO
Dell EMC PowerMax NVMe
VAST Data
INFINIDAT InfiniBox
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Pure Storage FlashArray Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More:
- Flashblade
- AI
- Support
- IOPS
- Performance
- Configuration
- Pool
- Custom
- Integration
- VMWare
- Primary Use Case
- Valuable Features
- Room for Improvement
- Nimble Storage vs Pure Storage, which do you recommend?
- When evaluating Enterprise Flash Array Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Is all flash storage SSD?
- What is VDI?
- What is the difference between thick and thin provisioning?
- Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?
- What are the advantages of all-flash storage over other types of storage?
- Which is better: IBM flash 9200 or EMC VMAX8000?