The primary use case is SAP. It work very well.
SAP is very important to our business. We are running all ERP solutions. Our configurations are run on-premise.
The primary use case is SAP. It work very well.
SAP is very important to our business. We are running all ERP solutions. Our configurations are run on-premise.
It has easy implementation.
The most valuable feature is its simplicity. It simplifies the administration and backup.
The predictive performance analytics works well.
I would like to have support available in Spanish.
The stability is perfect. The reliability is 100% and the latency is always lower than 1 millisecond.
The speed is very high on SAP from running it on Pure Storage, and the power on SAP HANA is much faster.
The scalability is good.
I would rate the technical support as a ten out of ten.
The initial setup was straightforward.
We deployed directly with Pure Storage.
The ROI is very positive for the reductions in HANA.
We have seen a 5:1 reduction in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).
We are finding the TCO of flash to be lower than SSD implementations by 2:1.
It's a simple, robust solution, which is very stable.
Pure Storage is very good and quick for backing up SAP HANA.