Qualys VM Review

The IT infrastructure needs work but WAF has improved our vulnerability identification.

What is most valuable?

WAF integration is valuable.

How has it helped my organization?

We can now perform vulnerability scans with WAF integration. The WAF has improved the vulnerability identification and reports to the SOC and CSO.

What needs improvement?

The IT infrastructure, especially server administration, needs to be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There was only one related, and that need work on our technology. As the solution is cloud based, we needed to adapt our internal policies.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were no issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This been done without a problem.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

It's good.

Technical Support:

It's good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

There was no previous solution, but I did execute several POCs.

How was the initial setup?

It was a regular setup for the configuration, but the official training was necessary.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We also looked at Nessus and GFI Languard.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Qualys VM reviews from users
...who work at a Comms Service Provider
...who compared it with Tenable SC
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Rapid7, Tenable Network Security and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: June 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user