Ranorex Studio Review

It's reduced the manual effort in verifying the user interface of the product under test, but there were some issues when the UI widget being tested was not developed in .NET.


What is most valuable?

  • It offers many features of recognizing UI widgets, making test automation easy. 
  • The spy feature is useful in updating the control address of modified UI widgets.

How has it helped my organization?

It's reduced the manual effort in verifying the user interface of the product under test.

What needs improvement?

There were some issues when the UI widget being tested was not developed in .NET, and the test resulted in some unknown actions when played back.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used it for a period of two months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability was an issue.

How are customer service and technical support?

I did not get to interact with the customer service.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution was used.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We used an in-house team.

What was our ROI?

I believe ROI is pretty high, although I am not involved with the management of the product.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is to spend some time reading the user guide and interacting with teammates who have already used the tool so that things become straightforward when you use it. It is a good tool to perform user interface testing over a .NET product.


Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Add a Comment
Guest