Red Hat Fuse Review

Red Hat Fuse could be considered a simple, robust and scalable ESB solution.


What is our primary use case?

We used RH Fuse solution for some integration between the new ERP system to our local legacies systems.

We take messages from MQ and then call a local API or leave a transformed file for a legacy system, and viceversa.

That has allowed us to reduce legacy system adaptation efforts.

How has it helped my organization?

The implementation of a ESB solution bring the opportunity of review the entire local integration strategy and start to rethink the company as a set of services.

What is most valuable?

We usually had used PowerCenter for master data integration (by replication). But in some cases, it was better to use Fuse for providing the master data online. It doesn't make it necessary to replicate data. So any application, especially new developments, get master data from a centralized repository (through Fuse), instead of having the master data replicated.

What needs improvement?


For how long have I used the solution?

We decided to implement a ESB solution three yeas ago (2017) facing a big ERP migration project in order to easily extent the integration strategy bring by the IT Central Team (the core integration model is base on a asyncronous strategy over a IBM Websphere MQ Series solution).

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good. The response is great. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's easy to scale in RH JBoss EAP solution. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Any time we contact Red Hat for help we had got a satisficing response.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously had used PowerCenter, but the purpose is completely different. We are still using it for Data Integration (big volume of data). And we still have some old transactional integrations over PWC that we should to migrate them to Fuse.

How was the initial setup?

The installation and configuration process is simple.

What about the implementation team?

We have a mixed team. We have look external help for the developing and supporting tasks.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It has the same pros/cons that all OpenSource solutions. But here you have a big company behind. You could choose pay the subscription and get al the help you need. RH Knowledge base page has helped us many times.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated IBM Integration Bus, Fuse, and MuleSoft. At that point, MuleSoft was just beginning locally and we didn't get so much references from partners. And Integration Bus was expensive.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Fuse. I don't think any other ESB tool makes big difference from Fuse. Many of this tools have the same problem: to publish and secure an internal service. Many tools bring other solutions to they ecosystems in order to extend to an API Gateway/Management functionality. You could reach the same adding others Red Hat tools.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

6.4.22
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: June 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest