Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Review

Stable, scalable, and good support but needs better pricing and ease of use


What is our primary use case?

It has storage and Hypervisor from Red Hat. It is used for computing and the virtualization workload for databases and other things.

What is most valuable?

It is stable and scalable.

What needs improvement?

The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper.

It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for more than two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has good stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is amazing in general.

How was the initial setup?

It isn't complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is quite pricey.

What other advice do I have?

I would not recommend this solution. There are a couple of other solutions that are easy to manage and install, and they are also not expensive. We plan to keep selling this solution, but we are not 100% sure.

I would rate Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure a four out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
More Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure reviews from users
...who compared it with VMware vSAN
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Sangfor, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hyper-Converged (HCI). Updated: June 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest