RSA Adaptive Authentication Review

Stock tokens work best for us but the solution is old; we can't use it on web pages


What is our primary use case?

We use it for authentication for users to get on to their primary systems.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages. I would like to be able to give the same ability to a user out there on the internet.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable. It's just old and slow.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability comes down to $50 per head.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before this solution it was just username and password, strictly.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. You build the Adaptive name to your server and then you just start adding tokens to it.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is $50 per head, yearly.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We'll probably go to Centrify or Thycotic.

What other advice do I have?

Look at something like Centrify or something along those lines: a single sign-on solution.

We use the physical tokens and stock tokens. It's an okay solution. It's just old technology and it's time to move on.

I would rate it as a seven out of ten. We're looking to move on from it. It's not a bad product but it's not a great product.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest