RSA enVision Review

Good management features but it should have better integration abilities

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises. 

What needs improvement?

In terms of what needs improvement, it could be more simple.

The integration could be easier, it should support more products. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for around six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We currently have three users using this solution. They're all architects. 

How are customer service and technical support?

I haven't had to contact their technical support. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use another solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was of medium complexity. 

What about the implementation team?

We used another company for the deployment. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to somebody considering it. 

Deciding what to store on this solution is critical before implementing it. You should analyze the data and logs and decide what to store on the product. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because it needs better customization for integration. It takes time to implement. 

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More RSA enVision reviews from users
...who compared it with IBM QRadar
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, Splunk, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user