Safe-T Secure Application Access Reviews

Name: Safe-T Secure Application Access
Brand: Safe-T
Rating: 4 (8 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

8 reviews
85% willing to recommend

137 followers

What is Safe-T Secure Application Access?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

Safe-T is a provider of Zero Trust Access solutions which mitigate attacks on enterprises’ business-critical services and sensitive data, while ensuring uninterrupted business continuity.

Get the Safe-T Secure Application Access Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Safe-T Secure Application Access, OpenVPN Access Server, Appgate SDP and more!

Safe-T Secure Application Access is the #20 ranked solution in top ZTNA solutions, #27 ranked solution in top Access Management solutions, and #44 ranked solution in top Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions. PeerSpot users give Safe-T Secure Application Access an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Safe-T Secure Application Access is most commonly compared to OpenVPN Access Server: Safe-T Secure Application Access vs OpenVPN Access Server.

Buyer's Guide

Safe-T Secure Application Access

March 2024

Get the report

Helped 768,246 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

it_user790473

Dec 18, 2017

We have a lot of in-house applications that we must integrate with a secure email system. We are a financial institute, so we must use it to send emails to our customers securely, because these emails contain sensitive customer data. The architecture of the product is very open to development, plug-ins and integration with in-house systems. We have been able integrate this system into our CRM and other operational systems. We didn't find that kind of flexibility in other secure email products. We have also been able to customize the user interface so it is branded and able to "talk" our marketing language. There is also a local Israeli vendor that helps us to improve the product, add the new features.

Read full review

it_user790539

Systems Administrator

Dec 18, 2017

It's really stable. We built a test server, and we did all the tests there. And then we did a pilot with a number of people, so we didn't go into production with everyone at once. We do it, monitor it. If there's bugs and fixes, they are applied for us. We didn't rush into production, we did a little, bit by bit. We didn't apply it to every employee of our company. And if there are bugs we tell them, and they will fix them. Then we add others and then we upgrade or we install that feature to all our employees.

Read full review

it_user781407

Solutions Sales VP at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Nov 29, 2017

For Safe-T SDA, one area of improvement would be the way the license is done. Whenever any of the IP addresses of the Safe-T SDA is changed, a new license request needs to be created and a new license needs to be imported. Another area of improvement would be the administration management. Safe-T needs to consider using a single URL to configure the different Safe-T SDA units which are deployed in the organization. For Safe-T SDE, the web user interface currently does not support the configurations of every feature. It does not support the configuration of the web server in the Safe-T SDE. Another area of improvement for Safe-T SDE is the creation of new connectors. The UI and the procedure in creating a new connector is pretty tedious. This procedure is not well documented.

Read full review

Valuable Features

"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."

Room for Improvement

"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Safe-T Secure Application Access Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare Safe-T Secure Application Access with alternative products

Learn more about Safe-T Secure Application Access

Safe-T’s cloud and on-premises solutions ensure that an organization’s access use cases, whether into the organization or from the organization out to the internet, are secured according to the “validate first, access later” philosophy of Zero Trust.

This means that no one is trusted by default from inside or outside the network, and verification is required from everyone trying to gain access to resources on the network or in the cloud.

Safe-T’s wide range of access solutions reduce organizations’ attack surface and improve their ability to defend against modern cyberthreats. As an additional layer of security, our integrated business-grade global proxy solution cloud service enables smooth and efficient traffic flow, interruption-free service, unlimited concurrent connections, instant scaling and simple integration with our services.

With Safe-T’s patented reverse-access technology and proprietary routing technology, organizations of all size and type can secure their data, services and networks against internal and external threats.

At Safe-T, we empower enterprises to safely migrate to the cloud and enable digital transformation.

Safe-T Secure Application Access was previously known as Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access.

Product Video

Safe-T Secure Application Access customers

Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash

Evgeny Belenky

Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

Community Spotlight #14 - Top XDR Tools and More

What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?