Functional Testing Tools » Selenium HQ Reviews » Version WebDriver 2.43 » Review

Selenium HQ Review

​I can run a set of regression test cases with every release to QA.

What is most valuable?

I can easily integrate with TestNG and Maven. Also I am able to set servers and hubs to execute my test case against

How has it helped my organization?

I can run a set of regression test cases with every release to QA.

What needs improvement?

I would like to be able to capture HTML header information but I have not been able to do that yet

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were no issues during deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Currently WebDriver is having issues running against the latest of Firefox.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There have been no issues scaling it out.

How are customer service and technical support?

There is none yet there is a lot sites where questions can answered.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used Capybara. I am more familiar with Java

How was the initial setup?

It was pretty straightforward. It needs some degree of programming knowledge.

What about the implementation team?

We did it in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's free.

What other advice do I have?

Go for it. This is one of the best open source solutions I know of.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest
Author
BUYER'S GUIDE
Download our free Functional Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about SeleniumHQ, Tricentis, Micro Focus, and more!
Download Now