SmartBear TestComplete Review

It gives us the option to work in the same suite without changing from one project to another.


What is most valuable?

  • Object spy and object recognition are working very well, giving us a lot of possibilities.
  • Option to work in the same suite without changing from one project to another, which is better than HP QTP/UTF.
  • USEINIT feature is really nice (+/- like importing in Java)

How has it helped my organization?

It didn’t really change the way my organization works.

What needs improvement?

A test case design (schema) module would be nice.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for nine months, and my customer has been using it for three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

I just contacted them once. They responded very quickly, which is good, but the problem was on our side, so I cannot really evaluate.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

TestComplete was already in place when I arrived, but I know that they chose it because of the debugger and the fact that TestComplete recognizes more objects than QTP/UFT.

What about the implementation team?

It was done in-house.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest