SonarQube Review

Reliable inspection with a quality indication system


What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for auditing our system.

What is most valuable?

The overall quality of the indicator is good.

What needs improvement?

I am not very pleased with the technical debt computation, it's a bit arbitrary.

The codification metrics could also be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the open-source version, on and off, for the past few years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is ok, but if you want to process large portfolios, it breaks down. 

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is reasonable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was reasonable.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is a licensing fee, but I don't know the exact cost because I use this solution in partnership with other companies.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have experience with Parasoft and other similar tools. 

What other advice do I have?

I would absolutely recommend this solution to another company.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight. I would give it a higher rating if the technical debt computation was improved.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More SonarQube reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Fortify Application Defender
Learn what your peers think about SonarQube. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest