Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Review

Offers full development life-cycle modelling yet does not support analysis of the models


What is most valuable?

  1. Modeling to the Open Group’s Archimate specification
  2. Model objects stored to a database for analytical purposes
  3. TOGAF and Zachmann frameworks reinforce method-specific content models, etc.

How has it helped my organization?

  1. Sparx EA is used to capture the current state of technology systems as it pertains to the business infrastructure and application components, and how they combine to support the business needs and goals
  2. Similarly, it captures the planned state for projects that are delivering change
  3. Similarly, it captures the planned state for projects that are delivering change

What needs improvement?

  1. The product inherently does not support analysis of the models. For example, to determine what business processes will be impacted by work on a specific server requires a person knowledgeable in the notation to manually perform the analysis.
  2. Documents generated from the product leave a bit to be desired.

For how long have I used the solution?

Over one year

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There are various add-on components depending on what features/version you buy. Trying to install all products as a non-admin did create challenges. Otherwise, installation with admin privileges was uneventful. Installation of the product’s database schema to the database was simple and the subsequent use of the database as a store for modeling data was easy.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No the product is generally very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No. This product is a desktop tool and generally would not have any scalability issues unless using a centralized service, such as a database server.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

No customer service has been needed in the one year of service.

Technical Support:

No technical support has been needed in the one year of service.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Other solutions in earlier years. This product was an initial purchase for this need and did not replace any other product within this context.

How was the initial setup?

Installation was straightforward for all components and configurations.

What about the implementation team?

In house implementation.

What was our ROI?

The nature of this product did not justify an ROI but given a typical fully burdened rate for employee time, the sub-$1000 price tag is quickly recovered.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

List price for EA Ultimate Edition was just under $1000/seat perpetual license. Use of a shared Microsoft SQL Server as a repository adds approximately $2.00/day for all EA users based on the company’s negotiated license fee.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Archimate from the Open Group as well as other more robust EA products, both open source and proprietary.

What other advice do I have?

This is really just a modeling tool. Despite its name it does not really compare to to other “enterprise architecture” tools from companies such as Orbus, and Troux. That said the product offers full development life-cycle modelling in addition to some project management tie-ins.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect reviews from users
...who work at a Government
Add a Comment
Guest
1 Comment

author avatarit_user249285 (User)
Vendor

I found this review helpful -- Clear feedback - words are not minced!