Statseeker Review

An easy-to-use product that helps us track bandwidth and port errors

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use for this solution is to watch and record ports for the entire network.

How has it helped my organization?

We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is its ease of use.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than fifteen years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of this solution is excellent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability seems to be pretty good.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support for this solution is good. Sometimes the response times need to be quicker, but their technical knowledge is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to using this solution, we were doing scripting to record bandwidth numbers, and this made things a whole lot simpler.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We performed the implementation in-house.

What other advice do I have?

We do not have the current version of this solution, but I would love for us to get it.

If you want something that is easy to use and catches the basics, especially for your first line people, then this is the product to go with.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Statseeker reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Statseeker, SolarWinds, Nagios and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user