Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Review

We use it for scheduling Unix and Wintel batches.

What is our primary use case?

Scheduling Unix and Wintel batches. Full package - finance, backups, transfers. Three environments.  

How has it helped my organization?

Our organization could enter the cloud at full speed. 

What is most valuable?

Triggers separate from tasks contrary to the competitors.  

What needs improvement?

Lifecycle management.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

solution in general stable however last OMS updates are blurring out this opinion.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

scalability is good however it is lacking alternative to extend controller cluster's node numer.

How are customer service and technical support?

reaction time is fair, however it happens that their will of help it not necessary handy, especially when you hardening the solution.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

previous scheduler was TWS 8.5.  More expensive, less stable, less capable

How was the initial setup?

a basic setup is straight forward however during setting some more advansed option it could be complex to achive

What about the implementation team?


What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

for sure unlimited license

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

control m

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Stonebranch Universal Automation Center reviews from users
Learn what your peers think about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
1 Comment

author avatarRadomir P.
Top 10Real User

lack of status driven agent monitoring