UrbanCode Deploy Review

The gating and approval workflows are valuable.

What is most valuable?

  • The gating and approval workflows.
  • The udclient.jar API calls are relatively easy to understand.

How has it helped my organization?

  • Centralization of our deployment process
  • Unification of our nonprod and production deployment process

What needs improvement?

It makes it easier to create new resources, especially new components, and to import new servers into uDeploy Environments.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it for six months.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Once I understood the API, deployment was reliable.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have not encountered any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

Customer service is good.

Technical Support:

N/A: I have not had to invoke technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved in the initial setup & configuration.

What about the implementation team?

We use IGS on site to assist our IT staff as needed.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are still evaluating competitors like XebiaLabs Release, Puppet and Chef Automate. There is a chance we could move to Chef Automate

What other advice do I have?

Learn the API and automate common tasks from your CI|CD pipeline

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Sign Up with Email