Veeam Agent for Linux Review

Easy to install and manage but it needs to support physical machine backup

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the instant restore option.

What needs improvement?

We are currently waiting for the continuous backup process.

The continuous backup process is not applied to Veeam.

Veeam must have a good solution for physical backup. On the Linux side, it is using an NFS folder sharing for files, but there are some security difficulties when using NFS, so we have issues using Linux file restore.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution easy enough to scale.

System administrators only use Veeam with one backup administrator.

How are customer service and technical support?

We are satisfied with technical support.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy and straightforward.

The deployment model is on a private cloud.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is fair and comparable with other backup solutions.

What other advice do I have?

If the production site has physical computers they will not be able to use Veeam, but if they have virtual machines then it’s very good to manage, install, and the reporting is also very good.

We do not have a business relationship with Veeam, we are customers.

I am certified with Veeam.

At the moment, this solution is not good enough.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Veeam Agent for Linux reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Dell EMC NetWorker
Add a Comment