Veritas SaaS Backup Review

Scalable, but has a lack of local storage and needs more scheduling capabilities

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution as a backup for our main boxes and console. It backs up our Linux server recoil machine. 

What is most valuable?

The solution integrates well with EMC solutions.

What needs improvement?

The solution does lack a lot of features, and we're considering switching.

The solution needs to offer more scheduling options so that, for example, I could make a schedule for a backup and have it locate and transfer storage on remote servers. It would be nice if we were able to get consoles automatically working.

The solution has a lack of local storage.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable; I haven't experienced any bugs or glitches on it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is easy to expand, but there's a lack of local storage.

How was the initial setup?

I can't speak to the initial implementation as it was already in place when I joined the company.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model.

At this point, I'd recommend other solutions as backups. I'd rate it six out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Veritas SaaS Backup reviews from users
...who compared it with NetApp SaaS Backup
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Amazon, Metallic and others in SaaS Backup. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user