VMware vSAN Review

It is stable and easy to work with, but it is expensive


What is our primary use case?

We have around 70 to 100 VMs, and we use VMware vSAN to store our data. We have a lot of daily data.

What is most valuable?

It is easy to work with, easy to handle, and easy to manage.

What needs improvement?

Its price could be improved. It is too expensive for our clients.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for around a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is quite stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We didn't increase our storage.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is really helpful. They are very efficient. I didn't have any problem.

How was the initial setup?

Its initial setup is not difficult.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is too expensive.

What other advice do I have?

It is a good solution to implement if you have a lot of data. It is quite stable and not too difficult to manage.  

I would rate VMware vSAN a seven out of ten. It is a good solution, but it is too expensive.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
More VMware vSAN reviews from users
...who work at a Healthcare Company
...who compared it with Nutanix Acropolis AOS
Learn what your peers think about VMware vSAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest