webMethods Integration Server Review

Enables communications between diverse systems

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for communication between different systems and automation of business processes.

How has it helped my organization?

It has enabled us to integrate some systems which needed a form of translation.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable components of the solution are API management and EDI.

What needs improvement?

The Flow language mapping tool could be a little easier to use. The interface needs improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been working with webMethods Integration Server for one year now.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support served its purpose. We do not need to use it much.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a different solution and we switched because it was a product that was being phased out.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We considered other solutions along with webMethods Integration Server, including BizTalk and Tibco. There were other solutions but they were outside our planned budget.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this product as an 8 or a 9 out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More webMethods Integration Server reviews from users
...who work at a Energy/Utilities Company
...who compared it with Mule ESB
Add a Comment