webMethods Integration Server Review

Enables communications between diverse systems


What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for communication between different systems and automation of business processes.

How has it helped my organization?

It has enabled us to integrate some systems which needed a form of translation.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable components of the solution are API management and EDI.

What needs improvement?

The Flow language mapping tool could be a little easier to use. The interface needs improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been working with webMethods Integration Server for one year now.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support served its purpose. We do not need to use it much.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a different solution and we switched because it was a product that was being phased out.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We considered other solutions along with webMethods Integration Server, including BizTalk and Tibco. There were other solutions but they were outside our planned budget.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this product as an 8 or a 9 out of ten.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

Version 10.1
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More webMethods Integration Server reviews from users
...who work at a Manufacturing Company
...who compared it with Mule ESB
Learn what your peers think about webMethods Integration Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest